Improving quality of life after breast cancer: a comparison of two microsurgical treatment options for breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL).

PURPOSE: Vascularized lymph node transfer (VLNT) entails the autologous relocation of lymph nodes to a lymphedematous region of the body, whereas lymphaticovenous anastomosis (LVA) creates a direct bypass between the lymphatic and venous system. Both techniques are meant to lastingly bolster the local lymphatic drainage capacity. This study compared safety and effectiveness of VLNT and LVA in patients with chronic breast cancer related lymphedema (BCRL). METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using data from our encrypted database composed of patients with chronic BCRL who were treated with either VLNT or LVA and had a minimum follow-up of two years. Patient-specific variables analyzed included pre- and postoperative arm circumferences, lymphedema stages and postoperative complications. RESULTS: A total of 105 patients met the inclusion criteria, of which 96 patients demonstrated a complete follow-up period of two years. The VLNT group displayed larger preoperative circumferential measurements, evident in both in the isolated examination of the affected arm, as well as when adjusted for the contralateral unaffected arm. Significant reduction in arm volume was achieved by both groups. However, VLNT demonstrated superior relative reduction rates than LVA, neutralizing any significant arm size disparities after 24 months. Surgery duration was slightly longer for VLNT than LVA. Postoperative complications, predominantly minor, were exclusively observed in the VLNT group. CONCLUSIONS: Both VLNT and LVA offer significant improvement for patients suffering from chronic BCRL. VLNT shows an even greater potential for improvement in more severe cases of BCRL, but involves a higher risk for (mostly minor) complications.

Combining reconstructive and ablative surgical treatment of chronic breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL): safe and effective.

PURPOSE: We investigated whether a one-stage combination of vascularized lymph node transfer (VLNT) with water jet-assisted liposuction (WAL) can be safely performed and results in improved patient outcomes such as a greater reduction in arm volume when treating chronic breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL). METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, we included all patients from our encrypted lymphedema database treated for chronic BCRL with VLNT or VLNT + WAL who had a minimum follow-up of two years. We analyzed patient-specific variables including arm circumferences as well as patient-reported outcomes before and after surgery as well as surgery time, surgery-related complications and patient satisfaction. RESULTS: Only the mean preoperative differences of the circumferences between the lymphedematous and the unaffected arm in individual patients showed a statistically significant difference between treatment groups (p < 0.05). Indeed, patients treated with VLNT + WAL had consistently larger differences in individual sets of arms and therefore more pronounced chronic BCRL. The mean surgery time was significantly longer in the VLNT + WAL group (p < 0.05). Complications were seldom and similar in both groups. Using a numeric rating scale, the level of patient satisfaction following treatment did not differ significantly between groups (p = 0.323). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that a one-stage combination of VLNT with WAL does not result in more complications even though it also entails a longer surgery time. This is acceptable as secondary interventions resulting in overall longer surgery times and higher costs can be avoided. A one-stage combination might be especially favourable for patients suffering from more severe chronic BCRL.

[Breast Reconstruction Strategies in Case of Planned Radiotherapy]. / Rekonstruktives Vorgehen zum Brustwiederaufbau bei geplanter Bestrahlung.

INTRODUCTION: The ideal technical and chronological approach of breast reconstruction in case of planned radiotherapy after mastectomy (post-mastectomy radiotherapy, PMRT) continues to be controversially discussed. METHODS: The authors analysed the MEDLINE Database PubMed for relevant studies concerning PMRT and breast reconstruction. The main theses from these publications were extracted and summarised. RESULTS: An implant-based approach is the least invasive technique for immediate breast-mound formation in a PMRT setting. Reconstruction in a PMRT setting with a two-stage expander-implant technique or expander-implant-autologous procedure can provide good to excellent cosmetic outcomes. In contrast to the implant-based approach, autologous reconstruction methods provide an improved quality of life as well as haptic and sensory advantages and are usually associated with lower complication rates. PMRT after autologous reconstruction can have a negative impact on the autologous tissue. A delayed autologous approach can be advantageous and should be generally favoured in high-risk patients. CONCLUSION: Factors influencing a meticulous planning of breast reconstruction including PMRT are surgical, aesthetic and patient characteristics, quality of life, preference and expectation. Ideally, PMRT is completed before autologous reconstruction to avoid radiation-associated side-effects on the final reconstructive result. If PMRT is likely, but potentially not necessary, an immediate-delayed procedure may be of advantage.

Randomized Single-Center Study of Effectiveness and Safety of a Resorbable Lysine-Based Urethane Adhesive for a Drain-Free Closure of the Abdominal Donor Site in a DIEP Flap Breast Reconstruction Procedure.

OBJECTIVE: The hypothesis of this parallel group randomized trial testifies if TissuGlu is a safe and an effective alternative to the conventional drainage placement in regard to post-operative fluid management in the abdominal donor site for autologous (DIEP flap) breast reconstruction with a higher postoperative patient quality of life. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data was collected for 58 women who required to be at min.18 years old with a BMI < 30 and not taking any SSRIs (Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors).Exclusion criteria: Discharge with indwelling suction drains at the abdominal site or signs of wound infection during hospital stay.The patients were randomized into a study group (donor site closure with application of surgical adhesive without drains) and a control group (donor site closure with drains) using a randomly sorted sealed envelope system.Th e primary outcome was defined as the number of post-operative seroma formations.The secondary endpoint was the evaluation of patient satisfaction with both methods. RESULTS: 58 patients underwent a DIEP reconstruction (29 in the control- and 29 in the study group).Both groups were homogenous. Rate of seroma was 17%(5/29) in the study group and 10%(3/29) in the control group which showed no statistical significance (p-value = 0.71).Smoking and previous abdominal surgery turned out to be a risk factor for seroma formation in the study group.Overall satisfaction was evaluated with a questionnaire and was higher in the study group. CONCLUSION: The abdominal closure with the surgical adhesive seems to be a safe procedure that contributes to patient satisfaction and increases the independence upon discharge in patients with adequate inclusion criteria.

Preoperative Perforator Mapping in DIEP Flaps for Breast Reconstruction. The Impact of New Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Techniques.

Deep inferior epigastric artery flaps (DIEP) represent the gold standard of autologous breast reconstruction. Due to significant variations in vascular anatomy, preoperative perforator mapping (PM) is mandatory in order to ensure the presence of a sufficient perforator within the flap. In this regard, CT angiography (CTA) is currently the method of choice. Therefore, we investigated the value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) techniques for preoperative PM in comparison to CTA. Patients underwent PM, utilizing both CTA and CEUS techniques. Documentation included the course of the vascular pedicle through the rectus muscle (M), fascial penetration (F), the subcutaneous plexus (P) and the skin point (SP) on either side of the abdomen. Thus, contrast-enhanced B-Flow (BCEUS), B-Flow ultrasound (BUS), CEUS, color Doppler ultrasound (CDUS) and CTA were evaluated in terms of the diagnostic consistency and effectiveness of PM. Precision (∆L) was then calculated in relation to the actual intraoperative location. Statistical analysis included Kruskall-Wallis, Levene and Bonferroni tests, as well as Spearman correlations. A total of 39 DIEP flaps were analyzed. Only CTA (∆L = 2.85 mm) and BCEUS (∆L = 4.57 mm) enabled complete PM, also including P and SP, whereas CDUS, CEUS and BUS enabled clear PM throughout M and F only. Regarding the number of detected perforators, PM techniques are ranked from high to low as follows: CTA, BCEUS, BUS, CEUS and CDUS. CTA and BCEUS showed sufficient diagnostic consistency for SP, P and F, while CDUS and CTA had a superior performance for M. BCEUS offers precise image-controlled surface tags and dynamic information for PM without imposing radiation and may, therefore, be considered a feasible add-on or alternative to CTA. However, BCEUS requires an experienced examiner and is more time-consuming.

Risk Factor Analysis for Flap and Donor Site Related Complications in 1274 DIEP Flaps - Retrospective Single Center Study.

Background: Breast cancer is the most common cancer affecting women worldwide. In Germany, in almost 70% of cases, women require a complete mastectomy and wish for breast reconstruction which is especially difficult when the breast was previously irradiated. The DIEP flap is then the gold standard for autologous breast reconstruction and shows an overall low complication rate. This study aims to underline the safety of the procedure yet point out potential risk factors for flap edge and fat necrosis in a retrospective series of 1274 DIEP flaps in our center. Patients and Methods: 1274 autologous breast reconstructions with the DIEP flap were performed in 1124 patients between July 2004 and December 2014 in our department. Retrospective risk factor analysis included age, BMI, smoking, chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy and comorbidities. Mean follow-up constituted out of 24 months. Results: Out of 1274 free DIEP flap breast reconstructions, 150 were bilateral reconstructions. In 785 cases the primary indication was previous mastectomy, followed by prior implant-based reconstruction in 265 cases. The total flap loss rate was 0.6%. Patients with a higher BMI and smokers had significantly higher complication rates than the rest of the cohort. Elderly patients ( 65 years), patients with diabetes and ones who had undergone chemo-/ radiotherapy did not present with higher complication rates. Conclusions: The DIEP flap surgery is a well-established method for autologous breast reconstruction with a low complication rate. Yet patient characteristics in terms of risk factors need to be taken into account for result prognosis and satisfactory long-term reconstructive results.

Perioperatives Management in der Mikrochirurgie ­ Konsensus-Statement der Deutschsprachigen Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Mikrochirurgie der peripheren Nerven und Gefäße.

Perioperative management in microsurgery is a key element of success in reconstructive surgery. There are no uniform concepts for this in the German-speaking countries and individual schemes differ significantly from each other, as ascertained in an expert survey. In the course of the 41st Annual Conference of the German-speaking Working Group for Microsurgery (DAM) held in Munich in November 2019, concepts were evaluated and a survey was carried out and summarised as a position paper in due consideration of the scientific literature.

The DIEP Flap as Well-established Method of Choice for Autologous Breast Reconstruction with a Low Complication Rate - Retrospective Single-centre 10-Year Experience.

Background Breast cancer is the most common cancer affecting women in Germany. Despite breast-conserving therapy (BCT) being carried out in almost 70% of cases, a high number of women still require complete mastectomy. Prophylactic mastectomy is also indicated for women with a BRCA 1/2 gene mutation. In addition to implant-based heterologous breast reconstruction, autologous breast reconstruction using a DIEP flap has been found to be beneficial, particularly for patients who had prior radiotherapy. This study aims to show that DIEP flap reconstruction surgery is the method of choice for autologous breast reconstruction with a low rate of complications. Patients and Methods Autologous breast reconstruction using a DIEP flap was performed in 1124 patients between July 2004 and December 2014. Retrospective study criteria included potential risk factors such as age, BMI, smoking, chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy, and comorbidities as well as outcome parameters such as postoperative complications. Outcomes were evaluated with a mean follow-up of 24 months. Results A total of 1124 patients underwent 1274 free DIEP flap breast reconstructions, of which 150 were bilateral reconstructions. The primary indication was previous mastectomy in 785 cases, followed by prior implant-based reconstruction in 265 cases. The total flap loss rate was 0.6%. Postoperative surgical revision for abdominal wall hernia was required in 0.2% of cases. The group with a higher BMI and the group of smokers had significantly higher complication rates. Elderly patients (> 65 years), patients who had undergone chemo-/radiotherapy and patients with diabetes did not have higher complication rates. Conclusion DIEP flap surgery is an excellent option for autologous breast reconstruction, with a low rate of donor site morbidity and low complication rates. DIEP flap surgery carried out in a specialised interdisciplinary breast centre in a standardised clinical setting after prior careful patient selection to take account of risk factors such as high BMI and smoking is a reliable method with a low complication rate and satisfactory long-term reconstruction results.

D-SUN Method to Prevent Double-Bubble Deformity in Broad Base Breasts with High-Rising Inframammary Fold.

Breast augmentation is the most commonly performed plastic surgery among women worldwide. With time, implant selection shifted from arbitrary implantation to precise planning. Different methods address the dimensional planning process. Many of them are complex to put into practice, focusing mainly on the breast base. Constricted, short lower pole breasts are morphologically predisposed to complication such as double-bubble deformity. Yet, by focusing on the distance between the nipple on stretch and the inframammary fold, the D-SUN method guides the surgeon to find the most appropriate implant volume for anatomical form-stable silicon implants and IMF incision to avoid complications.Level of evidence IV This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

Autologous Breast Reconstruction with SIEA Flaps: An Alternative in Selected Cases.

BACKGROUND: The deep inferior epigastric perforator flap has been shown to be a reliable option for autologous breast reconstruction. A further refinement in the transfer of lower abdominal tissue is the superficial inferior epigastric artery (SIEA) flap that does not require any incision of the rectus abdominis fascia or muscle and is superior regarding donor-site morbidity. OBJECTIVES: We conducted a retrospective study to assess reliability and outcomes of autologous breast reconstruction using SIEA flaps. METHODS: We performed autologous breast reconstruction in 1708 patients at our department between 2009 and 2018. Of those, 28 patients that underwent breast reconstruction using a SIEA flap were included for a retrospective chart review. RESULTS: Given an overall flap loss rate of 1.8%, we observed total flap necrosis following a SIEA flap in four patients (13%). All cases were secondary to arterial thrombosis. We further recognized a significant correlation between flap failure and a history of spontaneous deep vein thrombosis (p < 0.0001). There was no statistically significant relationship between flap failure and obesity (BMI > 30 kg/m2;p = 0.9) or flap failure and a history of abdominal operations (p = 0.6). CONCLUSIONS: The SIEA flap provides a reasonable option for autologous breast reconstruction with the great advantage of minimal donor-site morbidity. Nevertheless, its use should be preserved to selected cases with favorable anatomy. We therefore recommend proper patient selection based on preoperative computed tomography angiography, intraoperative clinical evaluation and history of hypercoagulable state. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

[Quality assurance in breast reconstruction - Establishment of a prospective national online registry for microsurgical breast reconstructions]. / Qualitätssicherung in der Brustrekonstruktion ­ Etablierung eines prospektiven nationalen Onlineregisters für mikrochirurgische Brustrekonstruktionen.

BACKGROUND: The loss of a breast, and thus of the female body shape, is often extremely traumatising for women affected. Although free flap grafts have become the gold standard in reconstructive breast surgery, it has not been possible to date to unequivocally document their superiority over conventional alternative techniques. To date, there are no data on the care situation in Germany. Neither the number of reconstructions nor the proportion of the individual techniques is known. A prospective online registry has been set up in order to systematically collect and transparently present the structure and quality of care. The long-term goals are to record the existing quality of care, improve deficits and to certify centres with the appropriate expertise to establish a high level of care nationwide. METHODS: For this purpose, the German Society of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons (DGPRÄC) has set up an internet-based database in which treatment data are recorded anonymously. As part of a certification process, auditors checked structure quality, compliance with specifications, and the stringency of the data entered in comparison with the hospital's internal documentation. If the evaluation is positive, the DGPRÄC quality seal is awarded. RESULTS: Since its introduction in 2012, the database has provided validated information. Initially, only a few departments were prepared to present their results transparently. However, the number has grown steadily in recent years. As a result, the quality recording assumed a pioneering function nationwide and can now be used as a reliable source of information by patients and doctors. The DGPRÄC website features a map of the centres, which are colour-coded according to their respective qualifications. It is thus possible to find a qualified plastic surgeon with comprehensive expertise in acceptable proximity to every oncological breast centre. CONCLUSION: The database provides an overview of the quality of the various surgical techniques and thus the possibility of serious self monitoring and scientific analysis. The systematic collection of data has contributed to strengthening the position of plastic surgery in the field of reconstructive breast surgery. However, the financial and personnel resources required to establish the database were clearly underestimated.

Immediate Versus Delayed Breast Reconstruction: Evolving Concepts and Evidence Base.

This article provides information about advantages and disadvantages of immediate and delayed breast reconstruction concepts.

Increased risk of recurrence associated with certain risk factors in breast cancer patients after DIEP-flap reconstruction and lipofilling-a matched cohort study with 200 patients.

BACKGROUND: Lipofilling is performed in breast cancer patients to optimize the aesthetic outcome following breast reconstruction after mastectomy. Despite its common usage worldwide, little is known about the interaction of the lipoaspirate and dormant cancer cells. Up to date, no risk factors that increase the risk for cancer recurrence have been established. This study aims to identify risk factors for lipofilling candidates after breast cancer and questions the oncological safety of lipofilling in lymph node positive disease. METHODS: Matched retrospective cohort study: the disease-free survival (DFS) between 100 breast cancer patients undergoing a lipofilling after their DIEP-flap reconstruction and 100 matched control patients with no subsequent lipofilling was analyzed. Further, patients were subdivided according to risk factors, which were categorized as patient-dependent factors (PDFs) and tumor-dependent factors (TDFs). DFS and hazard ratios (HR) were compared to identify potential risk factors that may increase cancer recurrence. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 76.5 months from the mastectomy, and 31 months from the startpoint to the end of follow-up. Seven and eleven patients had recurrence in the lipofilling and control group, respectively, presenting with comparable DFS rates and an insignificant HR =0.57, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.22-1.47, P=0.24. According to subgroup survival analysis, lipofilling increased the risk of recurrence in women with a positive nodal status (P=0.035) and a high-grade neoplasia (P=0.049). CONCLUSIONS: No general increased recurrence risk was observed between the lipofilling and control group. The subgroup analysis identified high-grade neoplasia and positive nodal status to be a risk factor for cancer recurrence. Patients with a known node positive disease have an increased risk of occult micrometastases in their lymph nodes. Further studies are necessary to clarify whether dormant breast cancer cells in form of micrometastases in the lymph nodes can be reactivated by the factors secreted by adipose derived stem cells.

Immediate-DElayed AutoLogous (IDEAL) Breast Reconstruction with the DIEP Flap.

Background: The most common cancer worldwide in women is breast cancer. The increasing number of cases each year, requires a novel curative approach that can combine oncological treatments and breast reconstruction yielding a pleasing and aesthetic breast that is a definitive and long lasting solution. Thus, the Immediate-DElayed AutoLogous (IDEAL) breast reconstruction principle was created to hold up to the standards of the needs of contemporary women. METHOD: The IDEAL protocol for breast reconstruction was developed in our department in cooperation with our breast surgery unit and describes a two-stage approach that implicates neoadjuvant radio-/ chemotherapy treatment regimes and tumor staging before the mastectomy in order to avoid post-mastectomy radiation. In a second step the breast is then reconstructed with autologous tissue for optimal and natural results. CONCLUSION: More and more patients decide to undergo breast reconstruction after breast cancer. The IDEAL concept offers a life-long and safe solution with a low rate of late complications.